IndyTruth Blog
Fight the Real ID power grab 
Friday, April 18, 2008, 11:55 PM - Activism, Policy
Posted by Administrator
The Real ID Act of 2005 was sneaked into law through the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief. It establishes new national standards for state-issued driver licenses and non-driver identification cards. It is unconstitutional and an unprecedented violation of state's rights.

States such as Maine, Montana and Vermont have challenged Real ID, insisting on maintaining their own state standards for drivers licenses and ID cards. They have since been bullied by the Department of Homeland Security, which threatened to not allow citizens of those states to travel without the national ID.

Real ID has been largely ignored by public officials. Only two legislators, W. Curtis Thomas (D) and Jim Marshall (R) attended a Pennsylvania legislative committee’s hearing on March 13. No media attended. However, a large group of passionate citizens came to the event to protest Real ID.

One of the few officials at the federal level to bring up this issue has been Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who said, "Maybe people want to have a national ID card in their state. In my state, they don't."

"Bullying the states is not the answer, nor is threatening their citizens' rights to travel,” Leahy said. "From Maine to Montana, states have said no."

Seventeen states have passed bills or resolutions rejecting Real ID. Make sure that your state says NO! Here is what you can do:

Read the American Free Press article, "Congress Must Act Decisively To Stop Police State 'REAL ID'".

Rep. Jim Guest in the Missouri State House of Representatives is leading the fight of many states to oppose Real ID. Visit his web site JimGuest.Com and download his brochure. Contact him if you have questions or would like him to send you hard copies of the brochure. He is very helpful!

Use these resources to inform your state representative, state senators, U.S. representative and U.S. Senators about Real ID.

Help protect our personal rights and state rights from another federal power grab. We can not sit back while the federal government is putting us into a massive (and quite vulnerable) control grid. Take leadership on the Real ID issue and educate your legislators and fellow citizens on it's importance.
add comment ( 11 views )   |  permalink   |  related link
Advisors to presidential front-runners held secret meeting 
Friday, February 8, 2008, 12:10 AM - Globalism, News
Posted by Administrator
In April of 2007, James P. Tucker Jr. reported in American Free Press that the Trilateral Commission held a secret meeting in Brussels.

The primary details leaked from this meeting regarded pressure on the United States to "adopt a carbon monoxide control policy," developing and increasing carbon taxes on products such as gasoline. They also discussed the development of the European Union and North American Union.

In addition to Trilateral chairman Peter Sutherland and former CIA head John Deutch, the list of attendees to this meeting is striking. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) and Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) attended in violation of the Logan Act of 1799, which states,

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Even more interesting are the following three names: Madeleine Albright, Zbigniew Brzezinski and Richard Armitage. These three figures happen to be the foreign policy advisors to the three remaining "front-runners" in the 2008 presidential race.

According to the Washington Post, "Madeleine K. Albright, President [Bill] Clinton’s secretary of state and now chairperson of the National Democratic Institute," is Hillary Clinton's "foreign policy adviser."

"Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s national security adviser and now a Center for Strategic and International Studies counselor and trustee and frequent guest on PBS’s NewsHour with Jim Lehrer," is Barack Obama's "foreign policy adviser."

And "Richard Lee Armitage, President George W. Bush’s deputy secretary of state and an international business consultant and lobbyist," is John McCain's "informal foreign policy adviser."

It seems that Ron Paul (R-TX), Mike Huckabee (R-AR) and Mike Gravel (D-AL) are the only candidates who weren't represented at the secret meeting less than a year ago. It also happens that these three candidates get the least media attention of the six total.

Jim Tucker pointed out in his article revealing the secret meeting that The Washington Post "is always represented at TC and Bilderberg meetings." They even called for the very tax increase discussed there in an editorial the next day. My research concurs; Donald E. Graham, Chairman and CEO of The Washington Post Company attended Bilderberg in 2007.

The Washington Post is also the only major media publication that I have seen report on who is advising the presidential candidates. In that report, "The War Over the Wonks", the Post lists advisors to Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Jonathan Edwards, Rudolf Giuliani, Mitt Romney and John McCain. Paul, Huckabee and Gravel are left out.

Edwards, Giuliani and Romney -- the other establishment candidates significant enough to warrant the Post's attention -- have seceded the presidential race to their Trilateral Commission opponents. Paul, Huckabee and Gravel will continue to be ignored, while the Trilateral Commission determines which of their three puppets will be the "leader of the free world."

Submitted by Douglass.
1 comment ( 14 views )   |  permalink   |  related link
Fluoride poisons your city water 
Wednesday, January 16, 2008, 10:31 PM - Activism, News, Policy
Posted by Administrator
A recent report by Scientific American suggests that "over-consumption of fluoride can raise the risks of disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain and the thyroid gland." They report that 60% of America's tap water has the poison purposely added, including 46 of America's 50 biggest cities.

According to the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, the City of Indianapolis "adjusts the natural fluoride concentration upward to the optimal level for the prevention of dental caries (cavities)." That optimum level is 1.00 mg of fluoride per liter of water.

Reuters reports that

Fagin, award-wining environmental reporter and Director of New York University's Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program, writes, "There is no universally accepted optimal level for daily intake of fluoride." Some researchers even wonder whether the 1 mg/L added into drinking water is too much.

They also report that "Fluoride in foods, beverages, medicines and dental products can result in fluoride over-consumption, visible in young children as dental fluorosis -- white spotted, yellow, brown and/or pitted teeth. We can't normally see fluoride's effects to the rest of the body."

A Chinese study associated high fluoride exposure with lower IQ. It can also increase the risk of bone fracture, especially for the elderly and diabetics.

We already get more than enough fluoride from our toothpaste, floss, mouthwash, and visits to the dentist. That already may be too much. It is absolutely ridiculous for the city add fluoride to the tap water.

I filter the chlorine and other unwanted chemicals from my drinking water, but nearly all water filters cannot filter fluoride. A fluoride filter must be specially ordered and is highly expensive. The residents of Indianapolis and 45 other major cities have no choice but to consume this poison every day as they bathe, cook, eat and drink. Think about how much tap water you actually consume. Every cup of coffee, tea, or mixed juices. Every glass of water, whether or not you have a filter in your refrigerator or faucet. Every serving of noodles, rice, potatoes or vegetables you boil on your stove. We most certainly absorb a lot of fluoride when we add all that to our regular mouth hygiene.

Over 1200 professionals are urging the U.S. Congress to conduct Congressional hearings on the subject and to cease water fluoridation. I personally have contacted the Indianapolis Mayor, City Council, IndyStar newspaper, and the WishTV I-Team.

You can find out if your city fluoridates its water by visiting If you are in Indianapolis, you can get contact info for the City-County Council at

Submitted by Douglass.
2 comments ( 88 views )   |  permalink   |  related link
Kucinich: The Fight in the Dog 
Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 03:25 AM - Elections, Opinion
Posted by Administrator
"It's not the size of the dog in the fight. It's the size of the fight in the dog." Dennis Kucinich is a man of principle as exceptional as Ron Paul. While Paul battles each day for the Constitution and his strict definition of liberty, Dennis will pick up about any fight that comes his way. I'm told the Congressman even acquired a porta-potty for a Cleveland tie-ball field after the league and the city councilman failed to take action.

I met Congressman Kucinich and his wife walking in a city park when I was twelve years old, and they stopped to talk with me and my friend for what must have been five or ten minutes. Maybe it was pure generosity, or maybe he foresaw that I would vote for his reelection to Congress eight years later, but I see it as a sign that his commitment to the people never takes a vacation.

Kucinich is a puzzling man, who every politically active American has had to take time to consider. He is a man who feels very strongly about what is right, but also about the value of democracy. I imagine him up late at night, brewing his infamous cup of tea, contemplating the struggle between republic and democracy (not Republican and Democrat, but the true meanings of the words).

Kucinich's allegiance is strictly to the people. This has at times conflicted him with matters of public policy. He faced a lot of criticism for his opposition to the right to bear arms, but there is no question that he believes in his heart that it is for the best. I can't say I agree, but I haven't turned my back on him for it. A politician like him is rare throughout the entire history of the world, not motivated by votes, special interests or whatever else may plague a great leader, but what he truly finds in his heart and mind to be the needs of the people.

I saw Dennis again this past summer, and he surprised me with a stronger stance on the value of the Constitution. I traveled to Washington D.C. for the first time in my life, to lobby for the restoration of habeas corpus to the federal government's treatment of detainees. There were many passionate speeches given the morning of June 26th. Politicians, activists, religious leaders, and even victims of torture presented speeches that brought the crowd to tears. And then Dennis Kucinich came to the podium. Faces lit up as bodies that had hid in the cool shade rose up and closed in on the stage.

Dennis didn't come to talk policy or to stir more emotions. He was like a John F. Kennedy or Martin Luther King, lifting the spirit of the crowd while calling for action. He began by asking if we were ready "to defend the letter and the essence of the Constitution," which he called the "sacred document ... that binds us as a nation." He immediately called for politicians to be held accountable, and was the only speaker that day to suggest impeachment as a solution, not because of "personality," but because of the Constitution, which "has a personality all to its own."

This week, Kucinich was on my mind again, as the primaries have begun and the establishment candidates are pulling every political trick in the book. Barack Obama, under the advisement and quite conspiratorial working of global elitist Zbigniew Brzezinski, manipulated polls and dominated the mainstream media's coverage. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney hijacked the New Hampshire Primary with the help of the Diebold electronic vote.

I reported on Wednesday how obviously fraudulent the New Hampshire results were. As many voters in New Hampshire and throughout the country became disgusted by it in the coming days, two candidates had the guts to take a stand, Democrat Dennis Kucinich and Republican candidate Albert Howard.

Republican Ron Paul disappointed many of his supporters when he made his statement on the suggestion of a recount:

"I carefully considered the arguments for and against a recount before instructing my campaign staff not to pursue it. Without a firm belief that vote fraud had taken place, and without the possibility that a recount would have increased the chances for success of our campaign, a recount would have diverted campaign resources, time, and energy away from crucial battles elsewhere."

Dr. Paul wanted to look forward, focusing his time and money on the coming primaries in Michigan and South Carolina. Kucinich, on the other hand, laid his candidacy on the line. Seeing integrity in the election system as much more important than his own desire to be President, Kucinich took the voters' side, and filed for a recount in New Hampshire. We of course must give credit to Mr. Howard as well for making it possible to recount both parties' results.

For the first time that I have witnessed, Dennis received some good karma for putting the people ahead of the party and the campaign. During an interview with Fox Business Network's Neil Cavuto, he suddenly exclaimed, "Holy smokes! I just found out. I have to get off the phone now. I have to make plans to go to Nevada."

A Nevada judge ruled that MSNBC could not exclude Dennis from its Nevada presidential candidate forum. The network had invited Kucinich, and then four days later uninvited him to the event. Dennis will battle the Democratic Party's "top three" candidates live on MSNBC Tuesday, January 15 at 9:00 PM. Although, MSNBC will appeal the ruling (remember, that's Obama's network. Look up what Zbigniew Brzezinski's daughter does for a living).

Perhaps there is a lesson in this for Ron Paul, who was excluded from Fox News' Republican debate in New Hampshire. Dr. Paul may be referred to as "Dr. No," but Mr. Kucinich never takes "No" for an answer. He accepts every challenge that comes to him and he does not back down. It is hard to imagine that one who fights so hard could not become President of the United States.

Posted by Douglass.
1 comment ( 19 views )   |  permalink   |  related link
New Hampshire Primary Timeline 
Wednesday, January 9, 2008, 05:37 PM - Elections, Media
Posted by Administrator
Thursday, January 3
Iowa Caucus results:

34% Huckabee
25% Romney
13% Thompson
13% McCain
10% Paul
04% Giuliani
01% Hunter

38% Obama
30% Edwards
29% Clinton
00% Others

Sunday, January 6
Fox News holds a Republican candidate "forum" (a.k.a. debate) in New Hampshire with candidates McCain, Romney, Huckabee, Giuliani and Thompson. Ron Paul is excluded from the debate despite beating Thompson in New Hampshire polls and defeating Giuliani in the Iowa Caucus, finishing with 10%. The New Hampshire Republican Party removed their sponsorship of the debate due to Fox's biased exclusion of Paul.

Monday, January 7
New Hampshire Zogby Poll:

36% McCain
27% Romney
10% Huckabee
09% Giuliani
09% Paul
02% Thompson
00% Hunter

42% Obama
29% Clinton
17% Edwards
05% Richardson
02% Kucinich
00% Gravel

Monday, January 7
The Clinton campaign stages two publicity stunts. Bill Clinton calls Obama story on Iraq a "the biggest fiary tale I've ever seen." Hillary Clinton cries during a Q&A. Both of these events would receive non-stop news coverage in the 24 hours leading up to the closing of the polls.

Tuesday, January 8
The media, specifically MSNBC discusses the same stories all day: Bill Clinton fairy tale, Hillary Clinton crying, Obama polling well, McCain vs. Romney, Rudy Giuliani focusing on Florida.

The polls close and results start coming in.

37% McCain
31% Romney
11% Huckabee
09% Giuliani
08% Paul
01% Thompson
01% Hunter

39% Clinton
36% Obama
17% Edwards
05% Richardson
01% Kucinich
00% Gravel

Wednesday, January 9
Voters report that they and their family members voted for Ron Paul in counties where the results showed Ron Paul receiving zero votes. Sutton County was a specific case noted in several articles.

BlackBoxVoting.Org calls Jennifer Call, Town Clerk for Sutton. "She confirmed that the Ron Paul totals in Sutton were actually 31, and said that they were 'left off the tally sheet' and it was human error."

Primary results show disturbing statistics comparing machine counts to hand counts in New Hampshire. Mitt Romney had a 7.5% increase in machine-counted results. Rudy Giuliani increased by half a percent. Hillary Clinton increased by nearly 5%. Paul, Huckabee and McCain all finished at least 2% lower respectively. Obama dropped by 3%, and Edwards, Richardson and Kucinich each dropped 1%. Electronic machines count a majority of the vote, and they are heavily slanted toward select candidates.

The New Hampshire Primary results are not an accurate count of how the New Hampshire voters decided yesterday. They are not consistent with the polls, and these inconsistencies parallel the unusual difference between machine and hand-counted votes.

One county is proven to have lost 31 Ron Paul votes due to an alleged "human error." BlackBoxVoting.Org said,

This is not an acceptable answer, especially because one of the most common forms of fraud in a hand count system is to alter or omit results on the reporting sheet. Hand count is lovely, transparent. They then fill out another reconciliation sheet, often in front of witnesses, and it looks fine. Then they provide a summary or media sheet with the incorrect results.

Studies continue to show that electronic voting machines and vote-counting negatively effects election results. Many of these machines are being banned in Ohio, California and other states. The machines banned in Ohio will be used in South Carolina. Election results cannot be trusted in this country. It has been proven time and time again over the past eight years. The media is also heavily biased, keeping establishment candidates in control of the airwaves.

Fraud can only sway the vote a few percentage points at the most. Ron Paul did not finish as well as he should have, regardless of whether fraud was involved. He did not run a successful campaign, and that is shown by the inconsistency of exit polls compared to where the candidates stand on the issues. New Hampshire voters were not informed of the fact that Ron Paul has the best position on their views. We need to call for recounts, and fight our states to ban electronic voting machines, but most of all, we we need to push massive numbers out to the polls to vote against the establishment candidates.
1 comment ( 12 views )   |  permalink   |  related link

<< <Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next> >>